The Singer Solution And World Poverty Essay - 1015 Words

Published on September 5, 1999, in The New York Times Magazine, the article â€Å"The Singer Solution to World Poverty†, was written by philosopher Peter Singer. This article states that the solution to world poverty is for Americans to donate income, not vital for necessities, to aid overseas organizations. Throughout his argument, Peter Singer uses such strategies as ethos, pathos, and logos to build his attempt at a legitimate argument. Thousands of children die every single day due to hunger, and using various logical fallacies Singer seems to ring on the reader’s emotions, making them feel guilty. Although Singer’s argument seems to be very unrealistic, it is true that people should be more aware of poverty, and take the necessary action to try to prevent it. American’s have worked for their wealth, so why should we be to blame for world hunger? Through Singers many hypothetical narrations he convinces readers that the fulfillment of indulgences of lu xuries is trivial in comparison to the needs of the world’s poor. In this article ethos is displayed throughout in many ways, beginning when Singer starts out by displaying trustworthiness through his authority as a utilitarian philosopher. He does this by stating his argument with undeniable confidence, which is displayed to the readers from the start. We trust him, and what he says, because of his credentials and this is a tactic exercised by various authorities, such as writers and public figures. The moral appeal to endShow MoreRelatedThe Singer Solution to World Poverty752 Words   |  4 Pagesâ€Å"The Singer Solution to World Poverty† You bought those new Jordans yet? How about the new iPad? What if I told you that you could possibly save a child’s life with that money? In his September 5, 1999 New York Times Magazine article â€Å"The Singer Solution to World Poverty,† Peter Singer goes in on American consumerism and its connection to world poverty. He also explains how donating $200 to overseas aid organizations like UNICEF and Oxfam America is enough to â€Å"help a sickly 2-year-old transformRead MoreThe Singer Solution And World Poverty949 Words   |  4 Pageschapter 20 ‘The Singer Solution to World Poverty’. In this chapter Peter Singer argues that normal spending of money on ourselves is immoral, and should be spent on the welfare of the poor. In this paper I am arguing against Singers theory because it contains errors and rest on a false premise. The premise of Singers argument is simple, people who make more money than is necessary for survival should and are morally obligated to give away all of their excess money to help the poor. Singer uses a coupleRead MoreThe Singer Solution And World Poverty987 Words   |  4 Pagesresponsibilities towards other individuals. In Peter Singer’s article, â€Å"The Singer Solution to World Poverty† he explains situations that may benefit poverty but in doing so explains a person’s morals and willingness of a person to do so. America a capitalist country that Americans work to making a living for themselves and for some their children. Working is a big factor in America that Singer uses â€Å"Dora a retired schoolteacher† (Singer 400) as an example of a situation. Though Dora knows nothing is freeRead MoreThe Singer Solution And World Poverty909 Words   |  4 PagesIn â€Å"The Singer Solution to World Poverty†, Peter Singer states that if Americans do not spend that much money in indulgences, they can actually stop many people from dying. He describes two hypothetical circumstances that support his Idea. In Dora’s case, she protects the boy when she discovered his deathly destiny. Unlike Bob’s case, He did not save the child’s life because he did not want to give up his luxurious car, because he invested his whole life savings on it. Singer adapt these two circumstancesRead MoreThe Singer Solution to World Poverty1062 Words   |  5 PagesIn the New York Times Article â€Å" the Singer Solution to World Poverty† the author Peter Singer argues that there is no reason why Americans don’t donate money to the needy when they can afford countless of luxury that are not essential to the preservation of their lives and health. Singer pursue the audience with two different situations trying to motivate the reader to donate money instantly. The fist situation comes from a Brazilian film, Central Station in which a woman called Dora, a retiredRead MoreThe Singer Solution And World Poverty953 Words   |  4 PagesIn â€Å"The Singer Solution to World Poverty,† Peter Singer argues that Americans are extremely materialistic people. People have the tendency to feel the need to go out and upgrade to the newest clothes or electronics. Even though there is nothing wrong with the possessions that they have now. Specifically, he points out somebody that goes out and buys a new very expensive suit. He suggests that instead of going out and buying that new fancy suit why not donate to relief programs that will help saveRead MoreEssay on Singers Solution to World Poverty1219 Words   |  5 PagesThe writer behind â€Å"Singers Solution to World Poverty† advocates that U.S. citizens give away the majority of their dispensable income in order to end global suffering. Peter Singer makes numerous assumptions within his proposal about world poverty, and they are founded on the principle that Americans spend too much money on items and services that they do not need. Singer uses some extreme methods in order to achieve his goal of getting readers to truly believe in his ideas and change their valuesRead MorePeter Singer Solution to World Poverty3113 Words   |  13 PagesSeptember 5, 1999 The Singer Solution to World Poverty By PETER SINGER Illustrations by ROSS MacDONALD The Australian philosopher Peter Singer, who later this month begins teaching at Princeton University, is perhaps the worlds most controversial ethicist. Many readers of his book Animal Liberation were moved to embrace vegetarianism, while others recoiled at Singers attempt to place humans and animals on an even moral plane. Similarly, his argument that severely disabled infantsRead MoreAnalysis Of The Article The Singer Solution And World Poverty By Peter Singer1087 Words   |  5 PagesChioma Obi Professor White English 1301-81002 25 September 2017 The Right Thing to Do: Ending Poverty The article, â€Å"The Singer Solution to World Poverty,† by Peter Singer provides the argument that Americans should spend some of their income to help those in need, instead of using it on luxuries that they don’t need. Singer supports his argument by indicating that we are somewhat like the characters in the story. I have mixed feelings with Singer’s claim because he expects that people have moneyRead MoreAnalysis of â€Å"The Singer Solution To World Poverty† Essay693 Words   |  3 Pagesï » ¿A Critique For â€Å"The Singer Solution To World Poverty† In the essay â€Å"The Singer Solution to World Poverty,† philosopher Peter Singer addresses the issue of poverty by suggesting Americans give away most of their income to aid those in need. Singer believes that withholding income is the equivalence of letting a child starve to death. Therefore, Singer suggests the ethical thing to do to end world hunger is to give up everyday luxuries. Although donating a vast amount of money could help dying

The Ethical And Legal Issues - 1831 Words

The Issue The concept of autonomy spans both ethical and legal issues as it pertains to the aging population. This paper will focus on the ethical perspective of trying to keep a balance between allowing an aging (65+) person to maintain their autonomy when making rational and intelligent life choices while at the same time assisting them from making bad choices that might harm them emotionally, financial, spiritually or even physically in some instances. Autonomy comes from the Greek word for â€Å"self rule,† and defines a person’s ability or capacity to make choices based on their personal beliefs and values. Unless decision-making capacity is taken away from a person through legal measures, all adults are presumed to have capacity to†¦show more content†¦As unique as we are throughout our lifetimes, we are just as unique in how we age. Seniors today who are 65-plus have a greater opportunity of living another thirty or more years, and while some are not healthy i n body and/or mind, a great many are living full and active lives. It is usually the family and friends who will be the first to observe if someone is failing in ADL’s (Activities of Daily 2 Living), and to what degree the person may need help making daily choices. People need to feel empowered in their lives in order to feel satisfaction and continue to have a purpose. Of prime importance in someone’s life is the feeling that they make a difference and that their thoughts and deeds matter. Contrasting Views While there are several components to the concept of autonomy, this paper will compare and contrast the elements pertaining to autonomy within the healthcare and legal system. When President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Older Americans Act (OAA) in 1965, the same year of the creation of Medicare, the OAA created the Administration on Aging (AOA), a division within the Department of Health and Human Services which funds community service programs for the elderly, as well as provides funding and administration for research projects in the field of aging. Amendments in 1972 to the OAA added the â€Å"National Nutrition Program† for elders. In 2000, the OAA was amended once again,

Cost Calculations †Managerial Accounting Free Essays

Problem 1 Page 40 a- Cost of goods manufactured = Direct cost + Indirect cost = [Direct Cost of Material + Direct Cost of Labor] + [Indirect Cost of Material + Indirect Cost of Labor + Utilities Overhead] = Total Cost of Material + Total Cost of Labor + Utilities Overhead = 120,000 + 90,000 + 40,000 = $ 250,000 b- Total Cost of Operation = Cost of goods manufactured + Selling, General admin. and expenses. = 250,000 + 60,000 = $ 310,000 c- Prime Cost =Direct Material Cost + Direct Labor Cost 80,000 + 65,000 = $ 145,000 d- Conversion Cost = Direct Labor + Factory Overhead = Direct labor + [Indirect Material + Indirect Labor + Utilities Overhead] = 65,000 + 40,000 +25,000 + 40,000 = $ 170,000 e- Product Cost = Cost of goods manufactured = $ 250,000 f- Period Cost = Selling, general admin. We will write a custom essay sample on Cost Calculations – Managerial Accounting or any similar topic only for you Order Now and expenses = $ 60,000 g- Unit Cost = Total Cost of goods manufactured/Number of unit product = $ 250,000/10,000 = $ 25 per unit Problem 2 Page 40 a- Cost of goods manufactured Total Cost of goods put into production + [Difference between Beginning Ending work-in-process] = [Total Direct Cost + Factory Overhead Cost] + [25,000-10,000] = [Direct Material Cost + Direct Labor Cost + Factory Overhead Cost] + 15,000 = [95,000+110,000+70,000]+15,000 = $ 290,000 b- Cost of goods sold = Cost of goods manufactured + [Difference between Beginning Ending finished goods inventory] = 290,000 + [(30,000)] = $ 260,000 c- Net Income or Loss = Sales – Cost of goods manufactured – Selling , general admin. and expenses = 300,000 – 260,000 – 75,000 = ($ 35,000) ; Net Loss Exercise # 1 Page 43 Direct Material Cost = $ 8,000 Indirect Material Cost = $ 2,000 Direct Labor Cost = $ 3,500 Indirect Labor Cost = $ 1,500 Factory Overhead = $ 5,000 Selling Expenses = $ 7,500 General admin. Expenses = $ 8,500 a- Cost of goods manufactured = Total Direct Cost + Total Factory Overhead = Total Direct Cost + [Total Indirect Cost + Factory Overhead for heat, light and power] = 8,000 + 3,500 + 2,000 + 1,500 + 5,000 = $ 20,000 b- Total Cost of Operation = Cost of goods manufactured + Selling, general and admin. expenses = 20,000 + 7,500 + 8,500 = $ 36,000 Exercise # 2 Page 43 Direct Material Cost = $ 25,000 Indirect Material Cost = $ 5,000 Direct Labor Cost = $ 30,000 Indirect Labor Cost = $ 4,500 Overhead [excluding indirect material labor Costs] = $ 15,000 a- Prime Cost = Direct Cost = Direct Material Cost + Direct Labor Cost = 25,000 + 30,000 = $ 55,000 b- Conversion Cost = Direct Labor Cost + Total Overhead Cost = Direct Labor Cost + Indirect Material Cost + indirect Labor Cost + Overhead Cost [excluding indirect material labor Costs] = 30,000 + 5,000 + 4,500 + 15,000 = $ 54,500 c- Product Cost = Cost of goods manufactured Total Direct Cost + Total Indirect Cost + Overhead Cost[excluding indirect material labor Costs] = 55,000 + 9,500 + 15,000 = $ 79,500 Exercise # 5 Page 44 75,000 unit/year Beginning work –in- process = 0 Ending work –in- process = 0 Total Cost of goods manufactured = $ 300,000 Number of sold units = 59,000 Number of non sold units = 14,000 Number of loss = 2,000 Beginning finished goods inventor y = 0 a- Expenses was for the year; Cost of each unit = $ 300,000/75,000= $ 4 per unit Expenses (Not sold units) = 14,000 * 4 = $ 56,000 b- Loss was incurred for the year; = 2,000 * 4 = $ 8,000 – Assets to be recorded as finished goods inventory was for the year; = 59,000 * 4 = $ 236,000 Problem # 2 Page 47 Beginning work-in-process $ 5,000 Ending work-in-process $ 6,200 Direct material cost $ 8,900 Direct Labor cost $ 10,000 Factory overhead $ 15,000 Beginning finished goods inventory $ 12,000 Ending finished goods inventory $ 22,000 Sales $ 37,500 Selling and general expenses $ 17,000 a- Cost of goods manufactured = Cost of production + [Difference between Beginning Ending work-in-process] = [Direct Material Cost + Direct Labor Cost + Factory Overhead Cost]+ [(1,200)] = 8,900 + 10,000 + 15,000 + [(1,200)] $ 22,700 b- Cost of goods sold = Cost of goods manufactured + [Difference between Beginning Ending finished goods inventory] = 22,700 + 10,000 = $ 32,700 Problem # 4 Pag e 48 Sales $ 945,000 Beginning work-in-process $ 75,000 Ending work-in-process $ 60,000 Beginning finished goods inventory $ 35,000 Ending finished goods inventory $ 54,000 Direct material cost $ 176,000 Direct Labor cost $ 250,000 Factory overhead $ 237,500 Selling Expenses $ 55,000 General and admin. expenses $ 117,000 a- Cost of goods manufactured Cost of production + [Difference between Beginning Ending work-in-process] = [Direct Material Cost + Direct Labor Cost + Factory Overhead Cost]+ [15,000] = 176,000 + 250,000 + 237,500 + [15,000] = $ 678,500 b- Cost of goods sold = Cost of goods manufactured + [Difference between Beginning Ending finished goods inventory] = 678,500 + [(19,000)] = $ 659,500 c- Net Income or Loss = Sales – Cost of goods sold – Selling expenses – General and admin. expenses = 945,000 – 659,500 – 55,000 – 117,000 = $ 113,500 Net Income How to cite Cost Calculations – Managerial Accounting, Essay examples